VidMate
Free YouTube video & music downloader
ACTOR
Vinessa ShawKevin RahmIndia EisleyAaron Stanford
DIRECTOR
Alistair Legrand
SYNOPSICS
Clinical (2017) is a English movie. Alistair Legrand has directed this movie. Vinessa Shaw,Kevin Rahm,India Eisley,Aaron Stanford are the starring of this movie. It was released in 2017. Clinical (2017) is considered one of the best Horror,Thriller movie in India and around the world.
A psychiatrist tries to put her life back together after a violent attack by seeking to repair the life of a new patient, but he has his own terrifying history.
Fans of Clinical (2017) also like
Same Actors
Same Director
Clinical (2017) Reviews
Decent until the end...
This movie actually started out pretty decent. One of the scenes in the first few minutes caught my attention and I was ready to settle in and enjoy a good psychological thriller. The premises is that Jane, a psychiatrist, specializes in patients with traumatic experiences and when she has a traumatic experience of her own at the hands of one of her patients, she decides to take on more easier patients at the advise of her own psychiatrist. That is, until Alex comes along. He is a man who suffered a horrible car accident and is severely disfigured. He has had a few reconstructive surgeries and now he no longer recognizes himself. She agrees to see him and in the process, the events of her past experience begins to haunt her more and more and she quits making any progress of her own. Now if I say any more, I will give up the "twist" of the movie. Yes, there's a twist and although I didn't necessarily see it coming, once it was revealed, the movie somehow took a turn for the worst. I don't know what happened in the last 30 minutes, but it didn't go with the flow rest of the movie. It became somewhat unrealistic and almost laughable in a bad way.
Not the worst movie, but pretty close
I had to force myself to finish the movie, because early on I was irritated by the crappy unrealistic story telling. Who goes outside their house and leaves their door open? Who leaves their windows open when they're being terrorized by someone? Who goes back into a house where they've just escaped an insane killer? How does a person escape an asylum so easily? The movie was too stupid. As for the "twist" while I have to admit I didn't see it coming, I spent most of the movie waiting for the disfigured guy to go full retard. It was obvious that he was insane. Plot was rubbish, lighting was rubbish, overall summary = rubbish. I'm giving it a 3 purely because of the lead actress. She was the only one carrying this movie.
When the good turns bad....really bad.
First off the only reason I'm even giving this movie a 5 star rating is because I have to support Vinessa Shaws (Dr. Mathis) performance. If it wasn't for her convincing role in playing a psychiatrist I would have left this movie 20 minutes later. So now after that being said. Well there's not much to say, the movie started off with a big hook that caught my attention and did its job to keep me interested, plus I was already liking the acting skills of the leading roll. But the last 30 minutes of the film had just nuked itself and blowing its chances of what could have been a pretty decent psychological thriller. But I have to admit... I've seen way worst plots then this film!! So I would just flip a coin on this one guys if you want to give it a chance. Good luck!!!
Starts well...then it takes a hard left towards the cliché zone.
Just to be clear, it's not a bad movie. The idea, the plot and the acting are good. It's just that they didn't present the plot in a good architecture. It starts fine, Jane, the psychiatrist is surprised during the night at her work place by a teenager patient of hers. The girl had self-inflicted cuts all over, and then brutally attacks Jane who kicks her away. Then, the girl slits her own throat. Some time latter, we learn that Jane is now in therapy with a psychiatrist, while having her own patients at home. She's got a boyfriend, who is a cop, and the girl was committed to psych ward. Jane is still haunted by her memories and nasty nightmares. Who could blame her? So, she decided to take on a difficult patient, a man whose face had been disfigured. Her own therapist is against it, since she is not ready to go back to hardcore cases. But she does it anyways. The patient starts to behave like a nut job. So she dumps him. For a while. Once again, who could blame her? She's got an human heart. She starts having vision about the girl in her home, and learns she had left he psych ward, due to lack of paying the bills. Stuff happens, she almost looses her mind, suffers other attacks...stuff you'd expect in this kind of movie. Then she steals some of her doctor's prescription papers so she could buy heavy meds. It all turns sour and she goes nuts, and ends up killing the boyfriend. She wakes up at the same psych ward her former patient was committed to. (You gotta appreciate the irony here.) Then, when she was about to loose the rest of her sanity, she puts all the pieces together (dunno how) and finds out that her disfigured patient is actually the girl's abusive father. It was the girls who had slashed his face off (he had claimed to have suffered a car crash). Also, she is told that the girl hung herself and was found three days afters; when someone close by noticed the smell. So, Jane runs away from the psych ward, and is captured by disfigured-dad. He takes her to her home, and she sees the dude had killed her best friend and her doctor. Of course there's that cliché moment, when the bad guy believes he's gonna win (don't they ever learn?) and tells Jane the entire story. They fight, but not very well (if you're used to watch U.F.C., you won't like this fight very much); he gets beat up, she gets beat up. Then, at the end, she rips what was left of his face (she grabbed his face as she was falling from the second floor window). She enters the house again and finds faceless-dad sitting on the couch, dead. Then the movie ends. And so does this review (I mean, what can I do? There's nothing more to say.).
Horrible ending
The first half of the film seemed promising enough by giving us a mystery that unlocks as we progress with the viewing. However, the ending totally destroys any sense of impressive writing by the creators. Not only is the supposed twist easily predictable, but there is almost no logic to the progression of events in the end. Nor is there any satisfying explanation which brings us to the one major fault that overshadows all others: there is no closure to the story. Are we just supposed to assume on our own how the story of our protagonist actually ends? At least other non-closure endings like inception were intentional and meant to make the viewer think. This one however doesn't. Its as if the story has a beginning, middle, almost done, but no real ending. Did no one teach these writers how to close a story out? I'm guessing not, and hopefully in the future they may go back to school and actually finish 8th grade writing.