VidMate
Free YouTube video & music downloader
ACTOR
Ric MaddoxAaron MarciniakRichard O. RyanShawn Parsons
DIRECTOR
Royston Innes
SYNOPSICS
Dead Men (2018) is a English movie. Royston Innes has directed this movie. Ric Maddox,Aaron Marciniak,Richard O. Ryan,Shawn Parsons are the starring of this movie. It was released in 2018. Dead Men (2018) is considered one of the best Action,Western movie in India and around the world.
Set in the lawless world of the Old West, 'Dead Men' follows the path of a young man forced on a journey to avenge the death of this father, protect the Apache tribe he has grown to love and reclaim the land and gold that is rightfully theirs.
Fans of Dead Men (2018) also like
Dead Men (2018) Reviews
3 Hours of Confusion and Boredom
I have never written a movie review before but this one just demanded one, perhaps to save some other souls from spoiling their evening. I had so looked forward to watching a 3 hour western because I really enjoy westerns. Fifteen minutes into the movie, my husband and I turned and looked at each other and both made a disparaging remark on the movie. My husband finally fell asleep and I forced myself to watch the entire thing. I kept hoping it would get better but it never did. This movie plays like it was produced and directed by a 10 year old. Sure does, right down to the part where the two men spit in their hands then shake on something. The movie is all over the place, no clear direction. Near the beginning, my husband states, "What just happened?" It was as if a scene was added to the movie that absolutely did not belong. The dialog was really very bad. The movie does not give endings to the main situations within it so if you watch it all in hopes of learning what will happen to certain people or of certain events, you will be sadly disappointed. This movie deserves a rating of 1 but I gave it a 3, only because you could see how hard the cast was trying and for the beautiful horses.
Incredible(y) stupid
A 3 hour conglomeration of every single poor western cliche ever portrayed in previous B flicks. Even use kids plastic poker chips lmao...soooo bad
Great independent western with a lot of heart
At the end of the day, this is an independent film, not a big budget star fest. So I don't know what all the harsh criticism is about, but I reckon the one star reviews are from disgruntled crew members, or actors who got rejected, because their comments are utterly unfair, somewhat bitter and quite frankly don't have a lot of substance. I mean who gives a monkeys about whether the guns are 100% authentically period or not, umm... no one gives two hoots about that and most westerns like the recent (highly enjoyable) Magnificent Seven are not remotely authentic! All you need to know is that the acting is solid, the story is gripping and the cinematography is awesome for a low budget, that's what matters. Trust me, I've seen (and been involved in) my fair share of low budget rubbish movies and this one does not deserve to be brandished with that iron. Sure it has its flaws, and without giving away any spoilers, there are some editing issues and a few elements that can be confusing, but no more than many big budget movies I could name (Troy anyone). Look at the end of the day you decide, but don't let what these haters say stop you from watching this action packed western, and if you're a fan of this genre like me, then I'm sure you'll at least love the locations, horses and fight scenes... plus there's an epic stunt at the end which I have never seen performed before and it left me breathless. I just wish I'd been on set to watch it for real, because it was performed by the actors themselves and not an expensive team of stunt men. I for one hope that there's a sequel and I give it a well deserved 10 star for effort, because to make a low budget western of this magnitude takes guts.
No! No! No!
Do NOT watch this! It's three hours long and not worth Three minutes of anyone's time.
An example of how NOT to make a movie
This is the most atrocious movie I have ever seen. Generally, I don't mind bad acting, or bad dialogue, low budget, or other attributes of relatively poor productions, but this one takes the cake. I don't normally post movie reviews and just leave it up to the viewer to decide if they like the movie or not. But this movie has so many bad directorial and production issues everything that you could do wrong was compiled into this one single film. Believe it or not, the one saving grace was that the acting was OK, in spite of what the actors had to work with. In fact, Sasha Higgins and Craig Hensley did a superb job, as did the Apache cast. However. it's the rest of the production that let them down. This is just a few examples, but there are many more to choose from: Continuity sucks. The plot and story line is all over the place. Flashbacks, dream sequences, and other events don't make logical sense. For instance, in one scene, the main character (Jesse Struthers) leaves the tribe, and during his absence, the Army meets with the Indians and gives them an ultimatum to relocate. Later, when Jesse confronts the Governor about the gold mine, out of nowhere it's like...Oh and I want the Indians given what was promised...? He wasn't there during the conversation, and hadn't been back to the tribe since. So what's the tie-in? (Maybe the Force was with him...?) In an earlier scene, Vance Edison is left for dead, and out of nowhere, days/months/years later (? who knows) he comes to life while a vulture is eating his eye. Not to mention his gullible quest for vengeance (of the person who shot his friend...not him) makes him look like a buffoon. And what about Jesse Struthers conveniently digging up the original deed to the mine? Right under the new owner's sign! How did it get there? Why was it there? Not in a box or anything. Just a piece of paper laying under 6 inches of loose sand for at least a year or more? And in one scene, the mayor makes a comment to Jake Struthers about his parentage or lineage (if only the public knew...) but it's never explained or clarified. Are they hinting at another plot line that wasn't followed through? This is just a few of the unexplained inconsistencies in the film. Crappy editing. Scenes cut to black for no reason. Scenes often don't have a logical transition. Next scene pops up out of nowhere. No establishing shots. It seems as if nothing was left on the cutting room floor. No editorial focus. If something was shot...by golly they're gonna stick it in somewhere, even if it didn't make sense. A lot of wasted footage that added nothing to the story. That's probably why it's 3 hours of incoherent nonsense. Makeup sucks. The repair to Vance Edison's eye looks like someone put a patch of silly putty on his face and didn't even bother to blend the edges or match his skin color. Doesn't even look an anatomically correct surgical procedure. Weapons are inappropriate for the post Civil War time frame depicted in the movie. Zero effort at authenticity and accuracy. And the ending didn't make sense or bring anything to closure. It looked like they tried to make a some kind of ambiguous ethereal statement but, as usual it was never followed up and left you hanging. It's like they either ran out of money, or ideas, or just got bored with the whole useless production and quit. Or maybe someone rang the bell for last-call so the cast and crew left the set and forgot to come back and finish the movie.