Tiny House of Terror (2017) Reviews

• Pretty silly even for Lifetime

  mgconlan-12017-07-16

  After the relative quality of "The Wrong Crush" and "Deadly Secrets by the Lake," "Tiny House of Terror" was a return to typical Lifetime slovenliness and silliness. The "original" story for this one came from Jill Sanford, usually an associate producer, and she worked it into a script in collaboration with our old friend from the Whittendale universe, Barbara Kymlicka. For most of its running time this didn't seem like the sort of story that would attract the attentions of Ms. Kymlicka, until a surprise twist at the end … well, we're getting ahead of ourselves. The central character is Samantha Hastings (Francia Raisa), wife of Kyle Hastings (Jesse Hutch), who in partnership with his friend Mark Chadwick (Matte Bellefleur) became an Internet gazillionaire developing a successful Web site called Host, which enables all the aspects of your home — lights, heat, air, appliances, entertainment, you name it — to be controlled by a single app. I've heard of such applications being tested in real life and being vulnerable to the same thing that happens in the movie: either an accidental glitch or a deliberate hack can mean your house basically takes you over and starts turning lights on and off, playing your TV at whatever channel it wants, locking your doors so you're essentially trapped inside, and any number of otherwise undesirable outcomes. Such duly happens to Our Heroine, whose story begins on one of those bucolic evenings beloved of Lifetime writers doing their exposition, in which Samantha, Kyle, Mark and Mark's wife Lindsay (Tammy Gillis) are in Kyle's house (which features a set of concrete stairs leading from the first to the second floor that reminded me of a human vertebra) playing charades and arguing intensely, but comically, over every play. Later Kyle and Samantha get into a much more serious argument when Samantha, pregnant with Kyle's child, suddenly goes into spasms in their living room and has a miscarriage — her second one. After this experience she obtains birth-control pills and starts using them because she doesn't want to go through either the physical or mental agonies of any more useless pregnancies, and when Kyle stumbles on the truth he's furious that she's gone on birth control without telling him and therefore deprived him of the opportunity to have a child. (If these were real-life people I knew, this is about the time I would be thinking of a polite way to tell them that maybe if they want a child so badly they should give up on the natural route and consider adopting.) Then Kyle goes off on one of his regular rock-climbing vacations, only he doesn't come back and he's reported as missing. Then Samantha has a traumatic experience in which her TV suddenly comes on and starts replaying all the recorded news reports of Kyle's disappearance, freaking her out both with the content of the reports and her inability to get Host to turn the TV off: she keeps telling it to do so and it responds merely by changing the channel. (Why it doesn't occur to her to unplug the TV was a mystery to me — unless Host has the TV cord booby-trapped so you can't unplug it without shocking yourself to death.) Though the house Kyle and Samantha were living in at the start of the story already seemed pretty small to me, especially for people who were supposed to be super-rich, it turns out that Kyle had planned a present for Samantha: the titular tiny house, only 300 square feet, located in a section of pristine country which Kyle and Mark wanted to develop, but to do so with ultra-small houses to make as little of a "footprint" on the site's natural beauty as possible. Just why Samantha would have needed a house of her own when she and Kyle were getting along decently, except for Kyle's desire for a child and Samantha's inability to bring a pregnancy to term, is a mystery locked in Ms's. Sanford's and Kymlicka's heads, but after Kyle's disappearance she decides to move into the titular tiny house of terror. It soon turns out that the "terror" she's involved in isn't either electromechanical or supernatural, but entirely explicable: someone is regularly breaking into the house and doing things like setting the garbage disposal to turn itself on when Samantha has opened it up and is trying to retrieve her wedding ring from it, and stealing all the photos of herself with Kyle and erasing the final text she got from him so she'll have no physical evidence of their relationship. About the only people Samantha has to turn to in her hours of need are Mark, Lindsay and Samantha's older sister Jackie (Nazneen Contractor), a nurse who's put her on anti-anxiety pills she's stolen from the hospital where she works (and got into trouble for doing so), along with Ben Oxley (William Vaughan), a local environmental activist who offers himself as her handyman. "Tiny House of Terror" has some nicely Gothic suspense direction by Paul Shapiro, but the writing is ridiculous and the cast is just dull — the villain is unconvincing and the sympathetic characters are just sleep-inducing. Given the success of Lifetime's series "Little Women" I had half-expected and half-dreaded that "Tiny House of Terror" would be a story about little people being terrorized by full-sized humans in houses built tiny because they don't have to be any bigger to accommodate them; that would have been totally tasteless but might also have offered a sleazier "Terror of Tiny Town"-type fun "Tiny House of Terror" doesn't even begin to offer as it stands!

  More

• Doesn't disappoint if you enjoy a good thriller!

  lillucky-644382018-07-16

  I really enjoyed this movie!!! Kept me on the edge of my seat. If you like a good thriller with a twist, check out this movie. won't say more.

• Yeah, it's a Lifetime movie.

  Otkon2018-07-18

  But it isn't half bad. Beautifully shot and decently acted. If it wasn't for the commercial break-editing, I might not have known it was a TV movie. There is a strong anti-environmental message about the dangers of living minimally on a magnetic vortex in southwest Canada. But not even that is enough to dissuade me from a future of tiny home living. And of course the villain was the cast member literally named CONTRACTOR and not the greedy contractor she murders. Not making this up.

  More

• Original

  Kristamw2018-08-01

  One of the most excellent Lifetime movies out there that starts out with an intense hook. A very original plot about a woman Samantha who has two miscarriages and her husband Kyle, a tech mogul, who is reported missing when he allegedly falls from a climb. Samantha is left alone in their high-tech home with annoying alarms that don't obey her commands. Stressed out by the chaotic environment and wondering if her husband is really dead (he was an expert climber), she moves into a tiny house, which Sam later discovers was a secret surprise to her. Why didn't he tell her about it, especially after how mad he was when she kept the truth of taking birth control pills from him in order to avoid another miscarriage? Once she moves in, her cozy home turns into a place of fear. Someone is breaking in and taking pictures of her and Kyle and rigging appliances in an effort to hurt Sam. This makes her recall all the times that Kyle thought someone was breaking into their home, so now Sam puts more stock in those concerns. The high-tense mood continues throughout. And then there's the large cast: Mark, Kyle's business partner, whose wife, Sam's friend, cannot find, a contractor who Sam does business with, who seems slightly interested in her home, an environmental extremist who protested Kyle's and Mark's development plans, and Sam's sister who insists on taking care of their mother who's been diagnosed with dementia. This well put together film has you guessing. Many Lifetime movies throw in a lot of red herrings, but this one was especially difficult to figure out; in fact, I didn't guess who the culprit was at all! I will say that the villain's motives were far-fetched. It could have worked had there been more development toward it, but the explanation didn't gel with the villain's relationship with Sam. There certainly should have been signs, even if we only saw the villain alone to indicate the motivation. Nevertheless, an entertaining film with a strong protagonist and a compelling story line.

  More